Thursday, May 6, 2010

Fare Thee Well...

Dear Americans,

Since this is over 3 sentences long I know that it will not be read by many.

But it contains 20 years of experience and work exposing the point of America to the only thing that matters. It is my hope that as Greece leads Western Civilization into its final desent, that America will read this to keep herself from wasting time with futher investigations as she desends into a French Revolution.

Back in 1989 I became exposed to the issues that only now appear to be confronting America in force to cause the uprising of the Tea Parties. This occurred because the Republican Party of New Jersey would not run a Pro-Life candidate, much less any candidate, against the Democratic incumbent at that time.

Finding the Parties working so well together, I became aware of the joint effort of the party system keeping my Christian values suppressed in the creation of statutory law, reshaping America to be something completely alien to me.

From that day forward I have personally confronted the Mark of the Beast in the form of the Social Security Number which will now reach its next evolution in the HealthCare Scheme of the Federal Government, which is set to become a mandatory chipping of THE PEOPLE with RFID technology..

Now America, who thought that they could apathetically sit back and see what happens next, will begin to understand how they have been long living under the surveillance society that knows far more about them than the 4th Amendment ever intended.

But that is OK isn’t it, because the U.S. Supreme Court has long been telling us what is OK and what is not, in consideration of the Bill of Rights?

It is OK because this is America and totalitarianism cannot ever happen here, whether it be Capitalistic, Communistic, Marxist, Nationalistic, or Socialist Totalitarianism, as Adolf Hitler was democratically elected, but somehow we are different. No, it is not.

Did the Totalitarian Federal Department of Education teach you what the Bill of Rights really is when you were in School, the same way that it is disclosed in WestLaw Group’s singular publication (ISBN 0-314-24548-0 ) of Judicial Authorities of the:

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Federal Appellate Rules of Procedure,
Supreme Court Rules,
Title 28 U.S.C.,
Bill of Rights,
Habeas Corpus Rules?or did they teach you the truth of the Bill of Rights from the Citizen’s Rule Book which only provides the one Paragraph of the PREAMBLE of the Bill of Rights?

Did they tax you so hard when you got out of school that you had no time or money to risk your life and family for the purposes of standing up for those Rights?

Did you have the time and energy to discover what the Bill of Rights was really all about as displayed at because WestLaw displays only the Introduction to the Bill of Rights that means nothing to the intent of the Bill and the Citizen‘s Rule Book only provides one paragraph from the PREAMBLE? which is what I have only recently learned as long and hard as I have worked for 20 years.

Bill of Rights (1789)

“The conventions of a number of States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.”
“RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:
“ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.”

(emphasis added)

In over 20 years of work with the law and conspiracy theories, this is really the only thing that I can prove without a doubt.

An important book from which Lawyers, Law Clerks, and Judges work from, completely deletes the PREAMBLE to the Bill of Rights which discloses that the ENTIRE GOVERNMENT, which includes the Supreme Court, and the Courts created under Articles I and III, cannot ever create any law, or vote, or ruling that in anyway trespasses upon and/or redefines “unalienable” Rights as evidenced by Human History and the intent of the Founders of America.

Yes, the Bill of Rights places Rights beyond the reach of ALL government officials (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) but the Courts have used the absence of the Preamble to re-interpret that which they were forever told to keep their hands off of, as the prior History of Rights could not be ignored and re-written to move the boundary stone that was supposed to confine the government.

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. " (emphasis added)

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette,
319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)(Opinion, J. Jackson)

Government, which is in charge of education does not want you to know about this, as the perpetual motion of the boundary stone is their key to controlling you, your future, your children’s future, all of our destinies, and keeping you in fear of wondering what is yours and what is a law violation.

Just today on May 5, 2010, Radio Host Glenn Beck quoted Thomas Jefferson on the issue of blindly following statute law over the fundamental law, and how such is an affront to liberty.

I have learned without any doubt that the terms, argument, and litigation of the Human Debate of Liberty/Rights is now controlled by an intellectual elite, an elite class of human beings, in violation of the original Bills of Rights of many states until they were re-written by lawyers.

Constitution of The State of Michigan (1835)
“Article I – Bill of Rights
“Section 3.
“No Man or set of men are entitled to exclusive or separate privileges.”

America is subservient to the Lawyer Aristocracy.

Your 6th and 7th Amendment Rights regarding jury trial, which used to include a Right to a fully informed jury, deciding the facts and the law, as the daily oversight of THE PEOPLE over government as shown at citing the transcript of Bushell's Case, Vaughan, 135, 124 Eng.Rep. 1006, 6 Howell's State Trials 999 (1670), have been reworked by endless case law and Rules to be meaningless shadows of government of THE PEOPLE.

Apparently, not only were the Judges dismantling the Magna Carta (1215) long ago, but in America the lawyers and judges began to dismantle our foundation of liberty from the very beginning, just read this:

See: Empowering the Jury as the Fourth Branch of Government, Justice William Goodloe at

This interference has plainly disrupted the entire idea of meaningful due process of law pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (Bill of Rights 1789).

The interference is so certain that the 6th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals website ( explains that the Jury has the Authority that it always had, but that the judges are not supposed to tell the Jury about it. (6th Circuit Court of Appeals Pattern Jury Instructions §§ 1.02 and 1.03; Horning v. District of Columbia, 254 U.S. 135, 138, 41S.Ct. 53, 54, 65 L.Ed. 185 (1920))

Apparently, billions on Federal Department of Education Money is used to help government avoid teaching THE PEOPLE the very power of their civic duty that makes citizenship of any value.

The interference is so certain that the Federal Courts have determined that one cannot bring up any argument of constitutional defense, as reserved under the 6th Amendment, in the case of criminal charges regarding income taxes, despite the fact that no law can ever be enacted against Rights as secured in the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) and the fact that no UNALIENABLE Right can be taxed:

“…as a citizen of that State. His 'privileges and immunities' must not be impaired, and all the privileges of the English Magna Charta in favor of freemen are collected upon him…

* * *

“Now, what are 'privileges and immunities' in the sense of the Constitution? They are undoubtedly the personal and civil rights which usage, tradition, the habits of society, written law, and the common sentiments of people have recognized as forming the basis of the institutions of the country. … It assumes that there were privileges and immunities that belong to an American citizen, and the State is commanded neither to make nor to enforce any law that will abridge them.” (emphasis added)

In re: Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 55 (1872)

"... It may be said that a tax of one dollar … cannot sensibly affect any function of government or deprive a Citizen of any valuable Right. But if a state can tax…one dollar, it can tax him a thousand dollars."
* * *
"If the Right … is one guaranteed by the Constitution, it must be sacred from state taxation." Ibid., Pg. 47.

Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35, 46-47

"If the State of Texas placed a tax on the right … at the rate of one dollar and seventy-five cents per year, no court would hesitate to strike it down as a blatant infringement of the freedom... Yet the poll tax as enforced in Texas is a tax on the equally important right to vote." [United States v. State of Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234,254 (1966)]

Harper v. Virginia Bd. Of Elections,
383 U.S. 663, 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966)

“…considerations control when the state, by legislation, seeks to regulate the enjoyment of rights. “
* * *
“…the power to tax is so far limited that it cannot be used to impair or destroy right that are given or secured by the supreme law of the land.”

Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.,
184 U.S. 540, 563 (1902)

“It could hardly be denied that a tax laid specifically on the exercise of those freedoms would be unconstitutional.” Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 480-487 (1943)

“… the individuals' rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed.” (emphasis added)

Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, 135 Or. 180, 294 P.461, 73 A.L.R. 721

"…the power to tax the exercise of a privilege is the power to control or suppress its enjoyment." [See also Jones v. Opelika, 316 U.S. 584, 56 S.Ct. 444 (1943); Follett v. McCormick, 321 U.S. 573 64 S.Ct. 717 (1944)] Murdock, supra, at p. 112

"That the power to tax involves the power to destroy; that the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create; that there is a plain repugnance in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another, which other, with respect to those very measures, is declared to be supreme over that which exerts the control, are propositions not to be denied." (emphasis added) McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 431 (1819)

“It is obvious, that it [the power to tax] is an incident of sovereignty, and is co-extensive with that to which it is an incident. All subjects over which the sovereign power of a state extends, are objects of taxation; but those over which it does not extend, are, upon the soundest principles, exempt from taxation. This proposition may almost be pronounced self-evident.

"The sovereignty of a state extends to everything which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission."

(emphasis and [bracketed material] added)

McCullough v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 431 (1819)

“It is elementary law that every statute is to be read in the light of the Constitution. However broad and general its language, it cannot be interpreted as extending beyond those matters which it was within the constitutional power of the legislature to reach.”

McCullough v. Virginia, 19 S. Ct. 134, 172. U.S. 102 (1898)

I lost sight of this in my 8 years of fighting with the IRS while trying to help people and families hold on against IRS attacks against their homes and businesses, attacks that merely exist to make the illusion that the random victimization of the People was somehow needed to pay for the expenses of the Federal Government, or propped up the value of the U.S. currency against the Congress‘ endless inflation by printing press and budget.

I got trapped in making argument of man made law where James Shackleford of Alabama showed me the section of the Secretary’s regulations which revealed that U.S. Citizens in the 50 States never earned gross income as defined by law as shown since at least 1922.

I did not develop the argument of 26 C.F.R. section 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)(A) which defined exempt income to never touch U.S. Citizens living and working in the 50 states. I only struggled for ways to apply the argument to help people.

It was Larken and Tessa Rose who placed their lives on the line and went to prison for researching and exposing the law all the way back to 1922.

It was the sacrifice and Trial of Attorney Tommy Cryer that affirmed the reality that I merely dared to question and Larken and Tessa confirmed at great cost.

It was the tragedy of Former Police Officer Gene Webb before Judge Ann Conway and US District Attorney Gold of Middle District of Florida who brought the question and argument before the IRS and a Federal Judge all at one time, and was set free physically and monetarily.

It was never me. It was always others in their unimaginable circumstances and incalculable bravery who made the difference.

Just as there were many lies of the Lawyers and Judges, there were as many lies of the Patriot Movement, obviously replete with agents provocateurs and con-men feeding upon my desperate countrymen and their families.

The law showed itself Constitutional in construction, but unconstitutional in the Administrative application by Treasonous Executive Branch Officials who were aided by the Treasonous Judicial Branch Officials.

As Patriots cried out that THE PEOPLE have no Rights in Administrative Process, which the Congress twice told the IRS to publicize and notify THE PEOPLE of but instead perpetually obfuscated it from general knowledge, I came forward with Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) which showed that the same Rights in Judicial process applied to Administrative Process.

This scared the hell out of the Treasonous Legislative Officials Charles Grassley and Max Bachus in 2001 who labeled all who dared to speak of the truth of the misapplication of the tax law to THE PEOPLE, to be deemed dangerous speech to be quashed.

Before it was over, the IRS and the Courts devastated the 1st Amendment and over 100 years of U.S. Supreme Court precedent which left the truth of speech regarding the government to only be subject to determination of a Jury in a State Court, and never in the hands of a mere Federal Judge in an injunction action.

Now, the Congress has placed the Treasury Secretary, who is a known tax cheat and should have been imprisoned, longer than the Roses and Irwin Schiff, in the sole position of deciding what speech can be made to the government in the realm of legal argument, in administrative due process, and subjecting such speech to a $5000 penalty if so inclined.

Yes, legal argument, discussion of the law, are now under control of the Tax Commissioner, just as was said by the U.S. Supreme Court in Grosjean v. American Press Co. as the final reason for the hostilities breaking out in the New World.

We live in a nation where speech (1st and 5th Amendment) is quelled by the Tax Commissioner, where the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. U.S. stated that only weapons of military value are constitutionally protected (2nd Amendment), yet they are the most regulated and those who have them without government permission go to prison for a long time or have their family members killed like Randy Weaver.

Thus the 1st, 2nd , 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments are mere shadows of what they were designed and agreed to be.

We live in a nation where the natural right of procreation now extends the jurisdiction of a court to reach a person and make them a debtor for a crime if they are too poor to pay the child support as ordered by Courts. (See: Interstate Family Support Act as codified in Michigan)

We live in a nation where there are 2.2 Million prisoners, which is 40% of the world’s prison population while we are only 5% of the world’s population.

We live in a nation where fathers like me, who cannot pay the outrageous child support are effectively and indirectly banished by threatened indefinite incarceration for contempt by Family Courts, in violation of the Eight Amendment. (Trop v. Dulles)

I have in these final years had the opportunity to expose a lot of the destruction of America by the government, as I have experienced much of it at its unmerciful hands.

I have provided to America Petitions for Recall of all of their U.S. Senators, which is the Right of THE PEOPLE to reform and abolish when it ceases to protect the Rights of THE PEOPLE (Magna Carta 1215, Declaration of Independence 1776, and at least 3 original State Constitutions) which is plainly our Right under the 9th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (Bill of Rights 1789).

I have researched the law and created a Constructive Notice regarding one’s right (not license) to hunt on their own lands to feed themselves and their community.

I have done the same regarding the Right to free passage on the public right of way without license.

I have done the same and made arguments in regards to private property being a natural right and therefore cannot be subject to taxation and thus destruction by the State, driving THE PEOPLE off of the land.

I have been forced to fight for my freedom and right to be near my children, who I have not seen nor held in over 6 years, by appeal after appeal and even the use of a Petition to the King’s Bench before the PA Supreme Court, all to no avail other than the single word “DENIED”.

The situation for America is dire.

Having seen the steady decimation of the Bill of Rights, it is clear that the Ballot Box has been completely compromised by a two party system controlled by the Lawyer Aristocracy who is only accountable to itself in its Bar Associations.

The undermining of the Jury Box, well compromised by the same criminal class, leaves America in a 1776 situation where the cartridge box appears to be the only choice for an individual under attack by under guise of statute law that violates the Constitution.

Nevertheless, Jury nullification has an opportunity to be resurrected against the Lawyer Aristocracy, as well as reasonable rumblings of State Nullification under the 10th Amendment is possible, with a Populist movement which eliminates the resistance of the Lawyer Aristocracy by use of 9th Amendment Recall and forced accountability thereof.

This is the next phase of progress in returning Liberty to America, unless it is hijacked by the Statist Partisan status quo of Two Party Totalitarianism.

There is the reality of the struggle of Government Union Employees v. Taxpayers which is being used against the Tea Party Right now, but that Army will have no base as the Congress hyper-inflates the currency thereby eliminating their purchasing power in an economy where there are not enough workers left to support them.

I have confronted many Patriot Leaders in the past in effort to keep THE PEOPLE focused on the simplicity of Constitutional Rights, and to not fall prey to beliefs in Statutory Totalitarian solutions of a Flat Tax, or a Value Added Tax, or a Fair Tax, as originally discussed by We The People Foundation, for the Congress was told by the Bill of Rights that it never had authority over Rights and direct interference into the Lives of the Citizens.

I have fully confronted Patriot mythologies about State Corporate Charters creating a different and separate State which is not subject to the Constitutional Restraint of Government against Rights, as no corporation created by any Legislature can exceed the Powers and Limits of the Legislature in the Constitutions that created and so bind them. (Reid v. Covert)

I have fully confronted the arguments of the statutory language of statutes (like the definition of “person”) which seek to make people argue minutia, interpretation, and court precedent, as the Legislature is so bound to the Constitution (Reid v. Covert) that it cannot reach UNALIENABLE Rights within the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) to redefine who and what WE THE PEOPLE are to then recreate us in THEIR image.

I have confronted the 14th Amendment Arguers with the fact of law that “person” in the 14th Amendment has to be the same “person” in the 5th Amendment.

I have exposed the fact that the 14th Amendment cannot redefine the agreed boundaries of the Constitution as constructed in the PREAMBLE to the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette), as any provision of a contract that nullifies the purpose of the contract is a nullity, unless it perhaps nullifies the entire contract as fraud vitiates a contract:

“The Constitution of Virginia
June 29, 1776
Bill of Rights; June 12, 1776

A declaration of rights made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention; which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

SECTION 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity, namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” (emphasis added)

I have argued and proved that the 14th Amendment is superfluous to make the States subject to the Bill of Rights, for the States were already made party to the Bill of Rights by the 10th Amendment and the fact that the Legislatures of the States were the Parties who approved the Bill of Rights.

Finally, the fact that there is nothing in Black’s Law Dictionary which explains that the 14th Amendment did anything but attempt to bring the States into subjugation to the Bill of Rights.

I have confronted the claims and arguments of the word “Citizen” somehow falsely eliminates the sovereign status of THE PEOPLE over and above the government and its officials as restrained (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette):

" the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty."

Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (Dall) 419, 471-472, 1 L Ed 440, 455 (1793)

“Sovereignty … in our system, .. remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power.”

Yick Wo, v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)
(emphasis added)

Thanks to Mr. Dale Robertson at, I have learned what each of us should have been taught before graduating High School, and that was the history, case law, and means of writing a Habeas Corpus for the enforcement of the Liberty as was to be guaranteed by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Courts duty to be watchfully protective of all of our Rights:

"[T]he court must be vigilant to scrutinize the attendant facts with an eye to detect and a hand to prevent violations of the Constitution by circuitous and indirect methods. Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property are to be liberally construed, and ‘it is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.' Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 , 6 S. Ct. 524, 535 (29 L. Ed. 746); Gouled v. United States, 255 U. S. 304, 41 S. Ct. 261, supra." (emphasis added)

Byars v. U.S., 273 US 28, 32 (1927)

“It does not at all follow that every statute enacted ostensibly for the promotion of these ends is to be accepted as a legitimate exertion of the police powers of the state. There are, of necessity, limits beyond which legislation cannot rightfully go. While every possible presumption is to be indulged in favor of the validity of a statute, (Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 718 ,) the courts must obey the constitution rather than the law-making department of government, and must, upon their own responsibility, determine whether, in any particular case, these limits have been passed. 'To what purpose,' it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, 'are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, …' The courts are not bound by mere forms, nor are they to be misled by mere pretenses. They are at liberty, indeed, are under a solemn duty, to look at the substance of things, whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution.”

Mugler v. Kansas, 123 US 623, 661 (1887)

The Courts have usurped the fundamental points of law of the Court, that they are charged with protecting the Rights of THE PEOPLE individually under the purpose of the Courts, as revealed by Habeas Corpus. This has been done with a preponderance of Rules making all of our inherent Right to be a shadows of what they were designed to be. The Courts have even created a twisted Totalitarian Rule of Standing to say that if the government violates everyone’s Rights equally that no on individual can seek redress of grievance through the judicial system.

Such is a plain and open invitation if not declaration of open War upon THE PEOPLE already acknowledged by the U.S. Supreme Court:

“These are not extravagant expressions. Behind them may be discerned the unceasing contest between personal [Page 372 U. S. 401] liberty and government oppression. It is no accident that habeas corpus has, time and again, played a central role in national crises wherein the claims of order and of liberty clash most acutely not only in England in the seventeenth century, but also in America from our very beginnings, and today. Although in form the Great Writ is simply a mode of procedure, its history is inextricably intertwined with the growth of fundamental rights of personal liberty. For its function has been to provide a prompt and efficacious remedy…”

(emphasis added)

Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 399-401 (1963)

For over 20 years of my life I have fought and argued against Patriot and government alike, without prejudice or favoritism, to attempt to show the World the truth, the whole truth, and what is really the truth about who and what we are.

So many have contributed and given more than anyone should have had to.

The truth found has been given away time and time again, as one who seeks to sell a book of the truth is not ethical, for the truth belongs to ALL of THE PEOPLE, and belongs to no one.

Even those who have written books are now silenced and imprisoned.

It was my hope for THE PEOPLE to find and know the truth, to have the ability to distinguish the lies of Patriots and Government from the Truth, so that they could be free again.

But Alas, freedom is held hostage by the Lawyer Aristocracy who infest our Courts, Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and Both Parties.

That bought out and paid for group of people, the Lawyer Aristocracy, those Goose Stepping Brigades (Lanthrop v. Donohue, 367 U. S. 820 (1961)) are not interested in a free society, but in bilking all that they can from what is left of THE PEOPLE, transferring ever more of America into their pockets and control.

When the Reforming masses figure this out, after being blocked in every vote and effort that they expend, then America will be on the cusp of change, for it is not Race, Religion, or Creed that separates us all, but the corrupted Lawyer Class which has sought to change the definition of Justice from cases to case and day to day to keep us agitated against one another.

They are the corruptors of Law who have torn down OUR Institution of the Jury and hidden the purpose and function of government as well as our Identity by eliminating three paragraphs of the Bill of Rights PREAMBLE from the authorities governing their actions.

Never has TREASON been so clear to implicate an entire Class of People, and that Class infesting every Branch of Every Government.

They being Officers of the Courts of their States the Lawyer Aristocracy breeches the separation of Powers as officers of Both the Judicial Branch and Legislative/Executive Branches, and Officials of the State Governments at the same time as being officers of the Federal Government.

Other than the Federal Reserve Bank who bought these People off with their promises of endlessly expansive/inflating paper money, whose cohorts have made Wall Street into an Institution of gambling and graft, the Lawyer Aristocracy has given America 234 years of Statute law overriding Rights and governmental duty to Rights, just as Parliament did in the 1770‘s.

They are the enemy that America must get past in order to get to the Federal Reserve Bank.

Their greatest lie is the same lie as Parliament, that the statute laws of Men are higher than the Laws of GOD as manifest in our founding documents, which elucidate the superiority of our UNALIENABLE Rights over and above all legislatures, offices, votes, and majorities (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette).

Hear their lies no more!

Even the original Virginia Constitution of 1776, which predates the Declaration of Independence, plainly explains that no societal contract can be created that can ever infringe on UNALIENABLE Rights. (See Above) They exist forever and no human can be born into a society where their parents gave their RIghts away.

I have fought and prayed long and hard with the little ability I have been given.

Now saddled with over $65,000 in child support arrearages, having tried to sell cars and debt settlement to find the means of paying the money, see my children again, and surviving, I have no more savings to use to hold on.

Either the economy is so bad that there is no work, or I am literally persona non grata to any corporation or business that feels it must report everything to the government. The troubles beset upon me make me too heavy for any individual to help me stand up.

This is where I am.

In a few weeks I either disappear into oblivion of homelessness, or report to the Family Court in North Hampton PA to be processed into their Jail indefinitely, for there is no place in this work force and society for someone like me who dared to believe in the Freedom that the government schools taught me was mine.

Ethics, values, and willingness to endeavor in a man such as me are not valued anymore in the world of work.

Like so many fathers in this nation, there is no means of keeping a drivers license, car, and home and pay the money that these monsters demand from me.

Options are closed, and time has run out despite my efforts to hold on until the collapse hit.

Perhaps when this nation straightens itself out on Ethics it can straighten itself out on Rights, then it can straighten itself out on finances, and it will let people not be punished for being poor and kept from their children. (By the way, people were punished for being poor after winning the War for Independence, read about Shayes and Fries’ Rebellions)

Perhaps the removal of Federal money to States as incentive for abusive programs will reach every corner of law and Rights, and we can have our Right to have family back.

As for me, it appears time to accept the reality that the Courts hear nothing and with the Tea Parties thinking that there are Two Party Totalitarian Statist Solutions to the problems created by the Two Party Totalitarian Statists, the future will play as the past, without any input from me that makes any meaningful effect.

Perhaps THE PEOPLE will soon come out of their Totalitarian Statist Stupor allow themselves to remember who and what they are, allow their neighbors to be free, and thus themselves.

If not, then Joseph Stack III was right. The only thing that will bring change is a body count.

As for me, I refuse to add any bodies to the count so far, except my own at their hands, if that is the only option that remains for me.

Fare thee well.

Thurston Paul Bell