Thursday, May 6, 2010

Fare Thee Well...

Dear Americans,

Since this is over 3 sentences long I know that it will not be read by many.

But it contains 20 years of experience and work exposing the point of America to the only thing that matters. It is my hope that as Greece leads Western Civilization into its final desent, that America will read this to keep herself from wasting time with futher investigations as she desends into a French Revolution.

Back in 1989 I became exposed to the issues that only now appear to be confronting America in force to cause the uprising of the Tea Parties. This occurred because the Republican Party of New Jersey would not run a Pro-Life candidate, much less any candidate, against the Democratic incumbent at that time.

Finding the Parties working so well together, I became aware of the joint effort of the party system keeping my Christian values suppressed in the creation of statutory law, reshaping America to be something completely alien to me.

From that day forward I have personally confronted the Mark of the Beast in the form of the Social Security Number which will now reach its next evolution in the HealthCare Scheme of the Federal Government, which is set to become a mandatory chipping of THE PEOPLE with RFID technology..

Now America, who thought that they could apathetically sit back and see what happens next, will begin to understand how they have been long living under the surveillance society that knows far more about them than the 4th Amendment ever intended.

But that is OK isn’t it, because the U.S. Supreme Court has long been telling us what is OK and what is not, in consideration of the Bill of Rights?

It is OK because this is America and totalitarianism cannot ever happen here, whether it be Capitalistic, Communistic, Marxist, Nationalistic, or Socialist Totalitarianism, as Adolf Hitler was democratically elected, but somehow we are different. No, it is not.

Did the Totalitarian Federal Department of Education teach you what the Bill of Rights really is when you were in School, the same way that it is disclosed in WestLaw Group’s singular publication (ISBN 0-314-24548-0 ) of Judicial Authorities of the:

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Federal Appellate Rules of Procedure,
Supreme Court Rules,
Title 28 U.S.C.,
Bill of Rights,
Habeas Corpus Rules?or did they teach you the truth of the Bill of Rights from the Citizen’s Rule Book which only provides the one Paragraph of the PREAMBLE of the Bill of Rights?

Did they tax you so hard when you got out of school that you had no time or money to risk your life and family for the purposes of standing up for those Rights?

Did you have the time and energy to discover what the Bill of Rights was really all about as displayed at because WestLaw displays only the Introduction to the Bill of Rights that means nothing to the intent of the Bill and the Citizen‘s Rule Book only provides one paragraph from the PREAMBLE? which is what I have only recently learned as long and hard as I have worked for 20 years.

Bill of Rights (1789)

“The conventions of a number of States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.”
“RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:
“ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.”

(emphasis added)

In over 20 years of work with the law and conspiracy theories, this is really the only thing that I can prove without a doubt.

An important book from which Lawyers, Law Clerks, and Judges work from, completely deletes the PREAMBLE to the Bill of Rights which discloses that the ENTIRE GOVERNMENT, which includes the Supreme Court, and the Courts created under Articles I and III, cannot ever create any law, or vote, or ruling that in anyway trespasses upon and/or redefines “unalienable” Rights as evidenced by Human History and the intent of the Founders of America.

Yes, the Bill of Rights places Rights beyond the reach of ALL government officials (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) but the Courts have used the absence of the Preamble to re-interpret that which they were forever told to keep their hands off of, as the prior History of Rights could not be ignored and re-written to move the boundary stone that was supposed to confine the government.

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. " (emphasis added)

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette,
319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)(Opinion, J. Jackson)

Government, which is in charge of education does not want you to know about this, as the perpetual motion of the boundary stone is their key to controlling you, your future, your children’s future, all of our destinies, and keeping you in fear of wondering what is yours and what is a law violation.

Just today on May 5, 2010, Radio Host Glenn Beck quoted Thomas Jefferson on the issue of blindly following statute law over the fundamental law, and how such is an affront to liberty.

I have learned without any doubt that the terms, argument, and litigation of the Human Debate of Liberty/Rights is now controlled by an intellectual elite, an elite class of human beings, in violation of the original Bills of Rights of many states until they were re-written by lawyers.

Constitution of The State of Michigan (1835)
“Article I – Bill of Rights
“Section 3.
“No Man or set of men are entitled to exclusive or separate privileges.”

America is subservient to the Lawyer Aristocracy.

Your 6th and 7th Amendment Rights regarding jury trial, which used to include a Right to a fully informed jury, deciding the facts and the law, as the daily oversight of THE PEOPLE over government as shown at citing the transcript of Bushell's Case, Vaughan, 135, 124 Eng.Rep. 1006, 6 Howell's State Trials 999 (1670), have been reworked by endless case law and Rules to be meaningless shadows of government of THE PEOPLE.

Apparently, not only were the Judges dismantling the Magna Carta (1215) long ago, but in America the lawyers and judges began to dismantle our foundation of liberty from the very beginning, just read this:

See: Empowering the Jury as the Fourth Branch of Government, Justice William Goodloe at

This interference has plainly disrupted the entire idea of meaningful due process of law pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (Bill of Rights 1789).

The interference is so certain that the 6th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals website ( explains that the Jury has the Authority that it always had, but that the judges are not supposed to tell the Jury about it. (6th Circuit Court of Appeals Pattern Jury Instructions §§ 1.02 and 1.03; Horning v. District of Columbia, 254 U.S. 135, 138, 41S.Ct. 53, 54, 65 L.Ed. 185 (1920))

Apparently, billions on Federal Department of Education Money is used to help government avoid teaching THE PEOPLE the very power of their civic duty that makes citizenship of any value.

The interference is so certain that the Federal Courts have determined that one cannot bring up any argument of constitutional defense, as reserved under the 6th Amendment, in the case of criminal charges regarding income taxes, despite the fact that no law can ever be enacted against Rights as secured in the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) and the fact that no UNALIENABLE Right can be taxed:

“…as a citizen of that State. His 'privileges and immunities' must not be impaired, and all the privileges of the English Magna Charta in favor of freemen are collected upon him…

* * *

“Now, what are 'privileges and immunities' in the sense of the Constitution? They are undoubtedly the personal and civil rights which usage, tradition, the habits of society, written law, and the common sentiments of people have recognized as forming the basis of the institutions of the country. … It assumes that there were privileges and immunities that belong to an American citizen, and the State is commanded neither to make nor to enforce any law that will abridge them.” (emphasis added)

In re: Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 55 (1872)

"... It may be said that a tax of one dollar … cannot sensibly affect any function of government or deprive a Citizen of any valuable Right. But if a state can tax…one dollar, it can tax him a thousand dollars."
* * *
"If the Right … is one guaranteed by the Constitution, it must be sacred from state taxation." Ibid., Pg. 47.

Crandall v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35, 46-47

"If the State of Texas placed a tax on the right … at the rate of one dollar and seventy-five cents per year, no court would hesitate to strike it down as a blatant infringement of the freedom... Yet the poll tax as enforced in Texas is a tax on the equally important right to vote." [United States v. State of Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234,254 (1966)]

Harper v. Virginia Bd. Of Elections,
383 U.S. 663, 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966)

“…considerations control when the state, by legislation, seeks to regulate the enjoyment of rights. “
* * *
“…the power to tax is so far limited that it cannot be used to impair or destroy right that are given or secured by the supreme law of the land.”

Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.,
184 U.S. 540, 563 (1902)

“It could hardly be denied that a tax laid specifically on the exercise of those freedoms would be unconstitutional.” Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 480-487 (1943)

“… the individuals' rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed.” (emphasis added)

Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, 135 Or. 180, 294 P.461, 73 A.L.R. 721

"…the power to tax the exercise of a privilege is the power to control or suppress its enjoyment." [See also Jones v. Opelika, 316 U.S. 584, 56 S.Ct. 444 (1943); Follett v. McCormick, 321 U.S. 573 64 S.Ct. 717 (1944)] Murdock, supra, at p. 112

"That the power to tax involves the power to destroy; that the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create; that there is a plain repugnance in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another, which other, with respect to those very measures, is declared to be supreme over that which exerts the control, are propositions not to be denied." (emphasis added) McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 431 (1819)

“It is obvious, that it [the power to tax] is an incident of sovereignty, and is co-extensive with that to which it is an incident. All subjects over which the sovereign power of a state extends, are objects of taxation; but those over which it does not extend, are, upon the soundest principles, exempt from taxation. This proposition may almost be pronounced self-evident.

"The sovereignty of a state extends to everything which exists by its own authority, or is introduced by its permission."

(emphasis and [bracketed material] added)

McCullough v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 431 (1819)

“It is elementary law that every statute is to be read in the light of the Constitution. However broad and general its language, it cannot be interpreted as extending beyond those matters which it was within the constitutional power of the legislature to reach.”

McCullough v. Virginia, 19 S. Ct. 134, 172. U.S. 102 (1898)

I lost sight of this in my 8 years of fighting with the IRS while trying to help people and families hold on against IRS attacks against their homes and businesses, attacks that merely exist to make the illusion that the random victimization of the People was somehow needed to pay for the expenses of the Federal Government, or propped up the value of the U.S. currency against the Congress‘ endless inflation by printing press and budget.

I got trapped in making argument of man made law where James Shackleford of Alabama showed me the section of the Secretary’s regulations which revealed that U.S. Citizens in the 50 States never earned gross income as defined by law as shown since at least 1922.

I did not develop the argument of 26 C.F.R. section 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)(A) which defined exempt income to never touch U.S. Citizens living and working in the 50 states. I only struggled for ways to apply the argument to help people.

It was Larken and Tessa Rose who placed their lives on the line and went to prison for researching and exposing the law all the way back to 1922.

It was the sacrifice and Trial of Attorney Tommy Cryer that affirmed the reality that I merely dared to question and Larken and Tessa confirmed at great cost.

It was the tragedy of Former Police Officer Gene Webb before Judge Ann Conway and US District Attorney Gold of Middle District of Florida who brought the question and argument before the IRS and a Federal Judge all at one time, and was set free physically and monetarily.

It was never me. It was always others in their unimaginable circumstances and incalculable bravery who made the difference.

Just as there were many lies of the Lawyers and Judges, there were as many lies of the Patriot Movement, obviously replete with agents provocateurs and con-men feeding upon my desperate countrymen and their families.

The law showed itself Constitutional in construction, but unconstitutional in the Administrative application by Treasonous Executive Branch Officials who were aided by the Treasonous Judicial Branch Officials.

As Patriots cried out that THE PEOPLE have no Rights in Administrative Process, which the Congress twice told the IRS to publicize and notify THE PEOPLE of but instead perpetually obfuscated it from general knowledge, I came forward with Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) which showed that the same Rights in Judicial process applied to Administrative Process.

This scared the hell out of the Treasonous Legislative Officials Charles Grassley and Max Bachus in 2001 who labeled all who dared to speak of the truth of the misapplication of the tax law to THE PEOPLE, to be deemed dangerous speech to be quashed.

Before it was over, the IRS and the Courts devastated the 1st Amendment and over 100 years of U.S. Supreme Court precedent which left the truth of speech regarding the government to only be subject to determination of a Jury in a State Court, and never in the hands of a mere Federal Judge in an injunction action.

Now, the Congress has placed the Treasury Secretary, who is a known tax cheat and should have been imprisoned, longer than the Roses and Irwin Schiff, in the sole position of deciding what speech can be made to the government in the realm of legal argument, in administrative due process, and subjecting such speech to a $5000 penalty if so inclined.

Yes, legal argument, discussion of the law, are now under control of the Tax Commissioner, just as was said by the U.S. Supreme Court in Grosjean v. American Press Co. as the final reason for the hostilities breaking out in the New World.

We live in a nation where speech (1st and 5th Amendment) is quelled by the Tax Commissioner, where the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. U.S. stated that only weapons of military value are constitutionally protected (2nd Amendment), yet they are the most regulated and those who have them without government permission go to prison for a long time or have their family members killed like Randy Weaver.

Thus the 1st, 2nd , 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments are mere shadows of what they were designed and agreed to be.

We live in a nation where the natural right of procreation now extends the jurisdiction of a court to reach a person and make them a debtor for a crime if they are too poor to pay the child support as ordered by Courts. (See: Interstate Family Support Act as codified in Michigan)

We live in a nation where there are 2.2 Million prisoners, which is 40% of the world’s prison population while we are only 5% of the world’s population.

We live in a nation where fathers like me, who cannot pay the outrageous child support are effectively and indirectly banished by threatened indefinite incarceration for contempt by Family Courts, in violation of the Eight Amendment. (Trop v. Dulles)

I have in these final years had the opportunity to expose a lot of the destruction of America by the government, as I have experienced much of it at its unmerciful hands.

I have provided to America Petitions for Recall of all of their U.S. Senators, which is the Right of THE PEOPLE to reform and abolish when it ceases to protect the Rights of THE PEOPLE (Magna Carta 1215, Declaration of Independence 1776, and at least 3 original State Constitutions) which is plainly our Right under the 9th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (Bill of Rights 1789).

I have researched the law and created a Constructive Notice regarding one’s right (not license) to hunt on their own lands to feed themselves and their community.

I have done the same regarding the Right to free passage on the public right of way without license.

I have done the same and made arguments in regards to private property being a natural right and therefore cannot be subject to taxation and thus destruction by the State, driving THE PEOPLE off of the land.

I have been forced to fight for my freedom and right to be near my children, who I have not seen nor held in over 6 years, by appeal after appeal and even the use of a Petition to the King’s Bench before the PA Supreme Court, all to no avail other than the single word “DENIED”.

The situation for America is dire.

Having seen the steady decimation of the Bill of Rights, it is clear that the Ballot Box has been completely compromised by a two party system controlled by the Lawyer Aristocracy who is only accountable to itself in its Bar Associations.

The undermining of the Jury Box, well compromised by the same criminal class, leaves America in a 1776 situation where the cartridge box appears to be the only choice for an individual under attack by under guise of statute law that violates the Constitution.

Nevertheless, Jury nullification has an opportunity to be resurrected against the Lawyer Aristocracy, as well as reasonable rumblings of State Nullification under the 10th Amendment is possible, with a Populist movement which eliminates the resistance of the Lawyer Aristocracy by use of 9th Amendment Recall and forced accountability thereof.

This is the next phase of progress in returning Liberty to America, unless it is hijacked by the Statist Partisan status quo of Two Party Totalitarianism.

There is the reality of the struggle of Government Union Employees v. Taxpayers which is being used against the Tea Party Right now, but that Army will have no base as the Congress hyper-inflates the currency thereby eliminating their purchasing power in an economy where there are not enough workers left to support them.

I have confronted many Patriot Leaders in the past in effort to keep THE PEOPLE focused on the simplicity of Constitutional Rights, and to not fall prey to beliefs in Statutory Totalitarian solutions of a Flat Tax, or a Value Added Tax, or a Fair Tax, as originally discussed by We The People Foundation, for the Congress was told by the Bill of Rights that it never had authority over Rights and direct interference into the Lives of the Citizens.

I have fully confronted Patriot mythologies about State Corporate Charters creating a different and separate State which is not subject to the Constitutional Restraint of Government against Rights, as no corporation created by any Legislature can exceed the Powers and Limits of the Legislature in the Constitutions that created and so bind them. (Reid v. Covert)

I have fully confronted the arguments of the statutory language of statutes (like the definition of “person”) which seek to make people argue minutia, interpretation, and court precedent, as the Legislature is so bound to the Constitution (Reid v. Covert) that it cannot reach UNALIENABLE Rights within the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette) to redefine who and what WE THE PEOPLE are to then recreate us in THEIR image.

I have confronted the 14th Amendment Arguers with the fact of law that “person” in the 14th Amendment has to be the same “person” in the 5th Amendment.

I have exposed the fact that the 14th Amendment cannot redefine the agreed boundaries of the Constitution as constructed in the PREAMBLE to the Bill of Rights (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette), as any provision of a contract that nullifies the purpose of the contract is a nullity, unless it perhaps nullifies the entire contract as fraud vitiates a contract:

“The Constitution of Virginia
June 29, 1776
Bill of Rights; June 12, 1776

A declaration of rights made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention; which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

SECTION 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity, namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” (emphasis added)

I have argued and proved that the 14th Amendment is superfluous to make the States subject to the Bill of Rights, for the States were already made party to the Bill of Rights by the 10th Amendment and the fact that the Legislatures of the States were the Parties who approved the Bill of Rights.

Finally, the fact that there is nothing in Black’s Law Dictionary which explains that the 14th Amendment did anything but attempt to bring the States into subjugation to the Bill of Rights.

I have confronted the claims and arguments of the word “Citizen” somehow falsely eliminates the sovereign status of THE PEOPLE over and above the government and its officials as restrained (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette):

" the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty."

Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (Dall) 419, 471-472, 1 L Ed 440, 455 (1793)

“Sovereignty … in our system, .. remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power.”

Yick Wo, v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)
(emphasis added)

Thanks to Mr. Dale Robertson at, I have learned what each of us should have been taught before graduating High School, and that was the history, case law, and means of writing a Habeas Corpus for the enforcement of the Liberty as was to be guaranteed by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Courts duty to be watchfully protective of all of our Rights:

"[T]he court must be vigilant to scrutinize the attendant facts with an eye to detect and a hand to prevent violations of the Constitution by circuitous and indirect methods. Constitutional provisions for the security of person and property are to be liberally construed, and ‘it is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.' Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 , 6 S. Ct. 524, 535 (29 L. Ed. 746); Gouled v. United States, 255 U. S. 304, 41 S. Ct. 261, supra." (emphasis added)

Byars v. U.S., 273 US 28, 32 (1927)

“It does not at all follow that every statute enacted ostensibly for the promotion of these ends is to be accepted as a legitimate exertion of the police powers of the state. There are, of necessity, limits beyond which legislation cannot rightfully go. While every possible presumption is to be indulged in favor of the validity of a statute, (Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 718 ,) the courts must obey the constitution rather than the law-making department of government, and must, upon their own responsibility, determine whether, in any particular case, these limits have been passed. 'To what purpose,' it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, 'are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, …' The courts are not bound by mere forms, nor are they to be misled by mere pretenses. They are at liberty, indeed, are under a solemn duty, to look at the substance of things, whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution.”

Mugler v. Kansas, 123 US 623, 661 (1887)

The Courts have usurped the fundamental points of law of the Court, that they are charged with protecting the Rights of THE PEOPLE individually under the purpose of the Courts, as revealed by Habeas Corpus. This has been done with a preponderance of Rules making all of our inherent Right to be a shadows of what they were designed to be. The Courts have even created a twisted Totalitarian Rule of Standing to say that if the government violates everyone’s Rights equally that no on individual can seek redress of grievance through the judicial system.

Such is a plain and open invitation if not declaration of open War upon THE PEOPLE already acknowledged by the U.S. Supreme Court:

“These are not extravagant expressions. Behind them may be discerned the unceasing contest between personal [Page 372 U. S. 401] liberty and government oppression. It is no accident that habeas corpus has, time and again, played a central role in national crises wherein the claims of order and of liberty clash most acutely not only in England in the seventeenth century, but also in America from our very beginnings, and today. Although in form the Great Writ is simply a mode of procedure, its history is inextricably intertwined with the growth of fundamental rights of personal liberty. For its function has been to provide a prompt and efficacious remedy…”

(emphasis added)

Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 399-401 (1963)

For over 20 years of my life I have fought and argued against Patriot and government alike, without prejudice or favoritism, to attempt to show the World the truth, the whole truth, and what is really the truth about who and what we are.

So many have contributed and given more than anyone should have had to.

The truth found has been given away time and time again, as one who seeks to sell a book of the truth is not ethical, for the truth belongs to ALL of THE PEOPLE, and belongs to no one.

Even those who have written books are now silenced and imprisoned.

It was my hope for THE PEOPLE to find and know the truth, to have the ability to distinguish the lies of Patriots and Government from the Truth, so that they could be free again.

But Alas, freedom is held hostage by the Lawyer Aristocracy who infest our Courts, Executive Branch, Legislative Branch, and Both Parties.

That bought out and paid for group of people, the Lawyer Aristocracy, those Goose Stepping Brigades (Lanthrop v. Donohue, 367 U. S. 820 (1961)) are not interested in a free society, but in bilking all that they can from what is left of THE PEOPLE, transferring ever more of America into their pockets and control.

When the Reforming masses figure this out, after being blocked in every vote and effort that they expend, then America will be on the cusp of change, for it is not Race, Religion, or Creed that separates us all, but the corrupted Lawyer Class which has sought to change the definition of Justice from cases to case and day to day to keep us agitated against one another.

They are the corruptors of Law who have torn down OUR Institution of the Jury and hidden the purpose and function of government as well as our Identity by eliminating three paragraphs of the Bill of Rights PREAMBLE from the authorities governing their actions.

Never has TREASON been so clear to implicate an entire Class of People, and that Class infesting every Branch of Every Government.

They being Officers of the Courts of their States the Lawyer Aristocracy breeches the separation of Powers as officers of Both the Judicial Branch and Legislative/Executive Branches, and Officials of the State Governments at the same time as being officers of the Federal Government.

Other than the Federal Reserve Bank who bought these People off with their promises of endlessly expansive/inflating paper money, whose cohorts have made Wall Street into an Institution of gambling and graft, the Lawyer Aristocracy has given America 234 years of Statute law overriding Rights and governmental duty to Rights, just as Parliament did in the 1770‘s.

They are the enemy that America must get past in order to get to the Federal Reserve Bank.

Their greatest lie is the same lie as Parliament, that the statute laws of Men are higher than the Laws of GOD as manifest in our founding documents, which elucidate the superiority of our UNALIENABLE Rights over and above all legislatures, offices, votes, and majorities (West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette).

Hear their lies no more!

Even the original Virginia Constitution of 1776, which predates the Declaration of Independence, plainly explains that no societal contract can be created that can ever infringe on UNALIENABLE Rights. (See Above) They exist forever and no human can be born into a society where their parents gave their RIghts away.

I have fought and prayed long and hard with the little ability I have been given.

Now saddled with over $65,000 in child support arrearages, having tried to sell cars and debt settlement to find the means of paying the money, see my children again, and surviving, I have no more savings to use to hold on.

Either the economy is so bad that there is no work, or I am literally persona non grata to any corporation or business that feels it must report everything to the government. The troubles beset upon me make me too heavy for any individual to help me stand up.

This is where I am.

In a few weeks I either disappear into oblivion of homelessness, or report to the Family Court in North Hampton PA to be processed into their Jail indefinitely, for there is no place in this work force and society for someone like me who dared to believe in the Freedom that the government schools taught me was mine.

Ethics, values, and willingness to endeavor in a man such as me are not valued anymore in the world of work.

Like so many fathers in this nation, there is no means of keeping a drivers license, car, and home and pay the money that these monsters demand from me.

Options are closed, and time has run out despite my efforts to hold on until the collapse hit.

Perhaps when this nation straightens itself out on Ethics it can straighten itself out on Rights, then it can straighten itself out on finances, and it will let people not be punished for being poor and kept from their children. (By the way, people were punished for being poor after winning the War for Independence, read about Shayes and Fries’ Rebellions)

Perhaps the removal of Federal money to States as incentive for abusive programs will reach every corner of law and Rights, and we can have our Right to have family back.

As for me, it appears time to accept the reality that the Courts hear nothing and with the Tea Parties thinking that there are Two Party Totalitarian Statist Solutions to the problems created by the Two Party Totalitarian Statists, the future will play as the past, without any input from me that makes any meaningful effect.

Perhaps THE PEOPLE will soon come out of their Totalitarian Statist Stupor allow themselves to remember who and what they are, allow their neighbors to be free, and thus themselves.

If not, then Joseph Stack III was right. The only thing that will bring change is a body count.

As for me, I refuse to add any bodies to the count so far, except my own at their hands, if that is the only option that remains for me.

Fare thee well.

Thurston Paul Bell

Friday, February 26, 2010

Two United States Blarney


The U.S. Citizen argument is flat out Wrong.

U.S. Citizen was recognized in the California Constitution of 1848 and recognized in Congress in 1849, despite what the North Carolina Republic people teach and claim about the 14th Amendment.

Furthermore, the U.S. appears in the Articles of Confederation...or was that the Northwest Ordinance. That should make one who believes this nonsense blush for failing to consult their Fundamental and Foundational Documents.

Person in the 14th Amendment is not a new Citizen who is a Subject of government nor artificial person because the word "person" appears as the second word of the 5th Amendment.

That AGAIN should make one who believes this nonsense blush for failing to consult their Fundamental and Foundational Documents.

The only false constructs are Statute law of lawyers who have stolen the Office, Flag and Seal of THE PEOPLE to make fake and void law to oppress THE PEOPLE and enrich their Aristocracy, on where they are above THE PEOPLE and only accountable to each other.

That is plainly Unconstitutional in the Original Constitution of Michigan 1835, which the U.S. Congress signed on to and Approved as well as THE PEOPLE, and thus must be a point of our Fundamental Law.

There is no principle of law or fact to support a second government called "U.S." on American Soil that does not yield nor is subject to the Bill of Rights.

Summer before last a 14 year-old girl who was strip searched n the School of a County, of a State, in its administrative jurisdiction got her case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court who ruled that she did in fact have 4th Amendment protections even in that place where all sorts of other rules exist and there is a corporation charter somewhere.

Last year in Heller v. D.C. it was made clear that the Incorporated Municipality of D.C. is a place where the 2nd Amendment is applicable and governs. The Battle of Rogue governments against the Rights of THE PEOPLE rages on.

In the Virginia Constitution of 1776, which precedes the Constitution for the United States of America (1787), it plainly states that there shall be no government within Virginia that is not subject completely to the Constitution, which included their Bill of Rights.

In the Same Constitution the Virginians also stated plainly and nakedly in Article I of their Bill of Rights, that MAN can enter into no societal contract that infringes upon UNALIENABLE Rights.

“The Constitution of Virginia
June 29, 1776

Bill of Rights; June 12, 1776

A declaration of rights made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention; which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

SECTION 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity, namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” (emphasis added)

Yes that is Right not even a societal contract can be formed against Rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court in West Virgina Board of Education v. Barnette explains that the Rights protected by the Bill of Rights (by the way the 9th Amendment makes it all encompassing) can never be subject to an vote of any legislature nor majority nor power of office.

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. " (emphasis added)

West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette,
319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)(Opinion, J. Jackson)

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court has admitted and made clear that creatures of Constitution are completely subject to the Constitution from which they come. Therefore, no Legislature can create a corporation by their authority to violate the Constitution.

“…a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution." Reid v. Covert, 354 US l (1957)

Finally, fraud vitiates the contract. The Declaration of Independence and no less than 3 original constitutions of 3 states (check New Jersey, Maryland ?, North Carolina ?, New Hampshire) explain that when the government ceases to protect the Rights of THE PEOPLE, it ceases to be the Government and THE PEOPLE owe it no allegiance.


----there is no Corporate Charter for a U.S. that can Violate the Bill of Rights and THE PEOPLE.

----there is no corporation that can exist in America that usurps the THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no government corporation that is not subject to the THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no government nor subdivision therefore that can exist that is not subject to THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no legal construct called U.S. that is not the same as the United States of America that is not subject to THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

It is Lawless People doing lawless things:

Lawless People continuing to do law less things:

“These are not extravagant expressions [Most Extrodinary Writ of Habeas Corpus ad subjincendum]. Behind them may be discerned the unceasing contest between personal [Page 372 U. S. 401] liberty and government oppression. It is no accident that habeas corpus has, time and again, played a central role in national crises wherein the claims of order and of liberty clash most acutely not only in England in the seventeenth century, [Footnote 8] but also in America from our very beginnings, and today. [Footnote 9] Although in form the Great Writ is simply a mode of procedure, its history is inextricably intertwined with the growth of fundamental rights of personal liberty. For its function has been to provide a prompt and efficacious remedy…” [remedy Lawyers and judges have usurped and tied down at every turn of use]

Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 399-401 (1963)

It is the Lawless Aristocracy of lawyers that infests every Branch of Government, every Office, every Court and both Parties to thrust their version of Statist Power down your throat.

It is servile and petulent America who is manipulated to serve those interests, who masochistically support the abuse of themselves and their progeny, who dare not understand Freedom. Liberty, Rights and the 9th Amendment, and who refuse their duty under Article 61 of the Magna Carta, which I do not offer my own self serving interpretation, but that of Sir Winston Churchill:

"Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect [1297] and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favor of any such successful attempts at abrogation [1215]. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it."

--Quote by Sir Winston Churchill, 1956,

It is they. the sloth and petulent, who are the problem and will carry it forward into the Tea Parties as I have found.

There is no complex legal structure that defeats the Fundamental law of America that springs forth from the Rights of Englishmen at the English Bill of RIghts and Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 and 1689 respectively, and the Magna Carta 1215. only mind sets of the sloths who want things given to them.

But just as with the 5 other reissues of the Magna Carta by the Crown, the Lawyers are always busy moving the boundry stone of WHO and WHAT We ARE, and how they must serve THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE.

I have personally discovered that even this present mass awakening of the People in the Tea Parties is false (as their leadership has railed at me and ejected me for showing what I have shown you), for they are Statist who want to be taken care of and to be given all that they demand,

The true Reformation is in the Continental Congress who has offered an actual course of action.

GOD'S speed and eternal Blessings to you,

Thurston Paul Bell

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Joe Stack-The Third Shot Heard Round the World Censored Posthumously

I have decided, being one censored myself by our free and restrained government, that it is not right that Andrew Joseph Stack  III (GOD Grant him peace and great reward for his bravery and patriotism) be censored in death.

From the hearing of the words of so many who appeared in Washington D.C. on September 13, 2009, his words will ring in their hearts in one capacity or another.

The government is afraid of his speech.

They are afraid that the American People will humanize him.

They are afraid that THE PEOPLE will understand him.

They are afraid of the issues he raises, the lie that America is to those who turn off the talking heads and the TV and learn to think for themselves.

They are afraid not what we will do, as Joe incites none to action nor believed that anyone will act, but they are afraid of what YOU WILL THINK of words of a man's suffering as so many Americans do, alone and in silence, words that then galvanize us together in the suffering government has wrought.

I offer you his words as transmitted to me. The cross appeared in the electronic language it was transmitted to me in, such might be a precursor to his canonization as Saint Joe American:

(one more thing for those in Israel: Baruch Goldstein is a Hero!)

it now begins
†"If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?”† The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time.† The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken.† Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it.† I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head.† Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy.† Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all.† We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers.† Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”.† I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood.† These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. †Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours?† Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies.† Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”.† It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system?† Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand.† Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand.† The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is.† If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?†

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s.† Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English.† Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions.† In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy.† We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God).† We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living.† However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0.† It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie.† It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father.† I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.† My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker.† Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement.† Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement.† All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time.† When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me).† I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread.† I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made.† I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer... and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report ( regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (


(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.


_††††† "another person" is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

_††††† "taxpayer" is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

_††††† "individual", "employee", or "worker" is you.

Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated.† The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d).† Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave.† Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time.† I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity.† This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”.† Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise.† The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists).† This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle.† If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks.† Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s.† Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that.† The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco.† However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall.† Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed.† Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare.† Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months.† This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive.† Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY!† After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change.† Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while.† So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done.† I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work.† The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA.† This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income.† I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need.† The sleazy government decided that they disagreed.† But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out.† Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present.† After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again.† But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle.† After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order.† I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting.† Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit.† By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented).† Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone.† The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything.† Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”.† Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone.† The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government.† Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough).† In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand.† It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants.† I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after.† But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change.† I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less.† I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are.† Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer.† The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different.† I am finally ready to stop this insanity.† Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)


Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Debt Crisis Admitted - Dollar Damage Imminent

When the TARP plan was suggested (September 2008?) I watched Paul Krugman, Professor Milner from Carnegie Mellon and some unknown from the Treasury Department debate it on News Hour/PBS.

Krugman and the Treasury guy were in favor.

Professor Milner said he had seen and advised in similar problems from Sweden to Chile and TARP was not the answer, that printing money was not the answer.

Krugman flip-flopped to Milners side before it was over.

Krugman was later given the Nobel Prize for Economics and flip-flopped again to the side of his friend Bernanke.

Bernanke was quoted before he was Fed Chairman as saying if a crisis occurred he would throw hundred dollar bills from a helicopter to solve the problem, one former CIA Operative explained to me in spring of 2007.

In reality, what he did do is throw hundreds of Billions of Dollars from a helicopter over his Friends places at Goldman Sachs, AIG, JP Morgan/Chase, Bank of America. (This was seen in 1987 and disclosed in the Tim Meitz book 'The Catastrophe of October 19, 1987 . . . and Beyond)

So plainly the plan has been all along to print money.

Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, and Martin Weiss and many others have said over and over again that the government printing money was not the solution to the contrived collapse caused by an unregulated financial industry that was a glorified and institutionalized Gambling Operation.

Even Gerald Clenete of Trends Journal has been moved to call the Recovery a Wallpaper recovery of paper money and call this the Greatest Recession leading to the Greatest Depression.

Last week an Asian Hedge-Fund manager (Mark Farber) on CNBC caused an uproar on set when he stated that America would default on its debt.

Here is the pinch...of this article.

A.  The Media is now admitting to the rise the Debt Crisis...that is coming...and the people who created it by the endless printing of money cannot stop it even with all of the Democrats and Republican Horses and Men as they cannot put Humpty Dumpty Economy (that sat on morally falling Wall Street) back together again.

B.  The Media now does not believe that the Democrats are the answer, but that the sacrifice of Reason, Rights, Liberty, and Freedom on the Altar of Consensus by the Hand of both Parties is the answer. 

C.  The Media and is showing America, by their reports on the reasoning behind the Bayh Decision, that the Money Powers will collapse the Political and Economic Systems if THE PEOPLE do not leave the debauched Two Thug System alone, and learn to like whatever they contrive to foist THE PEOPLE upon.

The Money Powers and Politicians do not appreciate the Majority of Americans bringing the meddling issues of Constitution, Freedom, Liberty, Prosperity of the People, and inperpetuum rights into the political sphere.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Response to recent Comments

I have received specific comments in regards to the Petitions which I felt needed wider address at this time.

One in particular regarding New Hampshire where the person asked how to include a Senator.

Both of the Senators of each State are already included. I double checked N.H. and both were still there.

Another comment wanted an inclusion of the Healthcare Bill issue. I sought to do that through the Causes covering Individual Regulation and Seizure of the People.

The government has for some time been seizing us in our persons through regulations and statutes. The Healthcare Bill is just the latest one that has the People upset, yet this process of reducing THE PEOPLE to chattels has been going on for a very long time.

One comment was wondering where they sign, and was looking at the wrong State Petition.

The list of the Petitions are Right there to the Right. Make sure you are at the Right One. You can add spaces for more people, even make sheets of blanks for people to sign and identify themselves appropriately.

The final comment I will address was regarding Virginia and the statutory and constitutional allowance of the Right of THE PEOPLE to Recall.

This is not a statutory effort where the government gets to tell you what your Rights are.

We know what our Rights are and that is what I believe I communicated in the Petitions.

Even Article 61 of the Magna Carta has the Right of THE PEOPLE to remove any official from office by force (not to mention make War on him and his family seizing his property) for violation of their oath to uphold the common law and fundamental Rights of THE PEOPLE.

Magna Carta is often quoted and referred to by the U.S. Supreme Court as a foundational and fundamental law of our Nation.

Having dispensed with the issue or question of statutory acceptance, by the construction of the Petitions squarely upon the antecedent Right of THE PEOPLE to reform their government as they see fit, this is a constitutional effort. It is the most basic form of peaceful constitutional effort that would precede a general popular uprising.

The force of this effort, as well as its success is numbers, large vast NUMBERS of people showing discontent, just like the 9/12ers and the Tea Party-ers. This is probably the last stop of non-violent redress and action for this nation, as the Senate appears to be ready to ever increase and solidify their violence against the Republic (your Rights).

The strength of this position is clearly in the 9th Amendment which the government cannot control as shown in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette. It has been our Right, it has always been our Right, it is not addressed in the Constitution for the United States of America, it is the Right of THE PEOPLE forever in the Declaration of Independence, what more can I show the world?

I am certain of one thing in this regard, if one does not believe that they have the Right to Recall these criminals and thugs, and they refuse to believe the words of the sources I have provided, I do not believe that it is possible for anyone to believe that they have these Rights if they insist on clinging to doubt.

This is what the public education system and Lawyer Aristocracy High Priesthood has done to Americans. It has made them forget who and what we are, that the only thing that can hold us together in our differences in the belief in individual Liberty and Rights.

Somehow, the founding documents were not destroyed to make History forget.

Press on countrymen. The government and its statutes are arrayed against the fundamental Rights of us all, just as Parliament did to this land in the beginning. There is no shelter nor solution in them. Their false authority is your chains. Inaction is no solution, only a vote for the tyrants.


Saturday, November 14, 2009

Action must be what THE PEOPLE will and are willing to do.

Action Report

Not having internet, I have been able to hear a little bit of audio through telephone from a friend.

With particularity the most interesting words came from comments or questions of Delegates after the presentation of a man who respects me enough to pick up the phone when I call; Mr. Jeff Dickstein.

One Delegate commented about a State nullifying the Amendment of the Constitution in question, to which Mr. Dickstein commented that such was tried in a state, but there was not enough support of THE PEOPLE to get the idea rolling forward and success would require many other states with motivation of THE PEOPLE to get the same thing going.

Thus, the missing ingredients for this Congress to be successful on that issue is:

a.) popular support; and;

b.) many states active at the same time.

Being that the issue is the income tax, and not everyone pays that or is interested, which is why the U.S. Department of Justice has trampled the First Amendment activities of the tax activist community, decimating it, without so much as a whimper of outcry of THE PEOPLE en masse; hope for any such awakening on a single issue is not likely to reach any critical mass.

Even Sun Tzu’s the Art of War explains that the Master General needs the cause that will make THE PEOPLE willing to give their Sons and Silver.

A Second Delegate, motivated by the exposure of the lawlessness of the Courts and the Executive Branch declared the circumstance was sufficient for the Continental Congress adopting a Declaration of Non-Compliance.

Mr. Dickstein had no comment to this, but the Delegate did go on to the point that such a Declaration meant that the signers would not comply with anything from the Federal Government whatsoever at whatever peril may befall the signer.

Such sounds like the self-sacrifice and slow martyrdom I am living everyday.

I cannot recommend this. I do not believe that any popular movement and uprising can be constructed upon this AT THIS PRESENT TIME.

While the idea is 1) well grounded in the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence, 2) is not a singular issue activity, and 3) it might be successful for people on a State by state basis, not requiring actions by another state to be successful, THE PEOPLE as of yet are not in a position to adopt a confrontational posture such as facing arrest, trial, and time in a federal prison. That is clear and has been for the past 30 years of the Liberty Movement.

The same is true for the Delegate who brought up declaring War against the Government, by quoting the Declaration of Independence.

Even the Founders in 1774-1775 struggled with the notion of Independence and War.

It was Concord Bridge where the surprise wind of change occurred, and they saw what THE PEOPLE were willing to do. Only then did a draft of a Declaration make it to a Vote.

Different Circumstances – Same Game

At this time, place and circumstance of America, things are different from a Parliament and a King in 1776.

In Washington, those are OUR OFFICES, OUR SEALS, OUR FLAGS which the abrogators/usurpers/traitors/mutineers/pirates have stolen!

They have taken Oaths and have commandeered the vessel and its mission. Should we declare War on the Vessel?

The Biggest Lie of All

They have the moral high ground of Capitol Hill.

They have the Bridge Deck for all to see and tell THE PEOPLE their actions are legitimate because they were voted in democratically, that the RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE were contracted to these elected representatives to dispose of at their will when THE PEOPLE voted them into office.

"We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." Simons v. United States, 390 US 377, 394 (1968)

Since the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that such is the case with one Right, how much more true is their intolerance when all Rights except voting rights are waived by voting?

THE PEOPLE have been stupefied (made Stupid) by being taught lies from the beginning.

Education is Truth

THE PEOPLE must be educated out of the lie, that they contracted their RIGHTS to be disposed of by vote to elected officials.

THE PEOPLE have been educated by (‘government stupefication’- if I may say) into the lie that the Congress has plenary (complete) control over everything and is not a legislature of limitations as a Republic is, and guaranteed by Constitution to be.

So, to lead this Nation to reclaim the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE Education will have to precede Action…unless…

the Continental Congress adopts a method of action that is also Education at the same time.

even then success of the Action will require specific elements:

Popular Support – it must have the support of a very large body of the population, either on a singular issue or multiple issues.

Low Time Treasure, and Talent costs – it must be easy, not consume a large amount of time, money, and require a special ability of each individual.

Low Intensity/Risk – participation in the action carries a low or reasonably survivable Risk to the individual, if unsuccessful.

Reasonable – the action itself is well grounded in thought and reason to fuel its own growth into a mass uprising (education).

Petitions for Recall Fit the Requirements

The mutiny of U.S. Congress, Courts, and the Executive against the Supreme Law of OUR Rights, Liberty, Tranquility, and Prosperity is clear and present.

1 to 3.6 Million People on 9/12/09 were able to take the time and treasure to fill Washington D.C. and make clear that THE PEOPLE will unite against the Government on multiple issues for the resolution of Self-Governance and Liberty, to get the government out of their lives.

That body of the populace has stated that they are willing to take Action of Vote, which is similar to the Petition, in order to make their voices heard.

The Petition signing act is very low cost in Time and Treasure for the individual signer, and the length of the Petition is the minimum amount of time and talent required to fully participate.

The Petition signing act is low intensity and Risk. There is no violation of any unconstitutional law by signing the Petition. It carries no action that should make any fear prosecution for being a part.


The body of the discontented PEOPLE is leaderless precisely because the discontent of THE PEOPLE is pursuant to so many different issues, and Organizations are single issue entities.

This is the Time, this is the Place, to unite THE PEOPLE on the singular issue of government interference and Control of their Lives and Liberty. Never before, have so many, been so enraged, by so much committed against them, by so few.

To lead them to victory, one must be able to hold them together against a defined common foe; Centralized Government Authority over their lives.

The diversity of the Continental Congress is the microcosm of the groups and States, where varied issues and body politics all converge and meet.

To be successful, the Continental Congress needs THE PEOPLE, popular support, an en masse movement, which is already afoot and ready for the low intensity action of the Petitions.

I might be wrong in all of this, but…It is my belief that THE PEOPLE cannot have their lives of tranquility and prosperity, as promised, as long as the Pirates and Traitors have possession of the stolen property of OUR Offices, Seals, and Flags, or have not at least made a great and valiant attempt to TAKE THEM BACK, even it only to be further insulted by government ever swelling their ranks.

Resistance will get the Governor Recalled and the numbers of THE PEOPLE should force State Legislative Officials on to the Side of THE PEOPLE. Such may well begin the retaking of the States that Judge Andrew Napolitano has spoken of.

There is much that the Petitions function for, and rejection is not a dead end.

Ponder carefully your course of Action Delegates.

Restrain your emotions.

There is an Army out here who will be lead by Leaders who recommend reasonable action, even action that is slowly graduated in risk and intensity, as the Rogue Government ratchets up its insults to the Rights of THE PEOPLE.

GOD’s Speed Delegates

Friday, November 13, 2009

The Cause of the Petitions and Continental Congress

Before I begin my article I wanted to make things easy for the people who are trying to catch up on the Blog, as the prior Articles on the Blog are not time sensitive, and carry a lot of explanation of things that will help the interested Reader.

So here is the hyperlinked list:


This was expected

Judicial and Legislative Tyranny

E. Pluribus Unum - The Spirit of 9-12-2009

You say you want a Revolution?… (Just who are the Revolutionaries)

They will say you want a Civil War…

Petition Structure and Substance

The Ultimate Despised Petition

Judge Proves In Perpetuum



The cause of the Petitions and the Continental Congress are one in the same.

The fact is that despite the authors of the Constitution and the Founders best efforts at making a system of Checks and Balances, something has seeped into the function of government that has made checks and balances to be a cruel hoax. A sick joke.

One of the Founders in particular (perhaps Benjamin Franklin), or someone in the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention (1776) either understood the problem with checks and balances being left only in the laps of those being paid to exercise power, and therefore gave everyone in the Convention an education to the point that they adopted a clause that created a "Council of Censors".

“SECT. 47. In order that the freedom of the commonwealth may be preserved inviolate forever, there shall be chosen by ballot by the freemen … called the COUNCIL OF CENSORS… whose duty it shall be to enquire whether the constitution has been preserved inviolate in every part; and whether the legislative and executive branches of government have performed their duty as guardians of the people, or assumed to themselves, or exercised other or greater powers than they are intitled (sic) to by the constitution: They are also to enquire whether the public taxes have been justly laid and collected in all parts of this commonwealth, in what manner the public monies have been disposed of, and whether the laws have been duly executed… they shall have power to send for persons, papers, and records; they shall-have authority to pass public censures, to order impeachments, and to recommend to the legislature the repealing such laws as appear to them to have been enacted contrary to the principles of the constitution.”

The job was simple, The only function of this body was just like a Police Citizens Review Committee. To identify and root out perpetrators of wrong acts.

In previous articles I did show some comments about the Magna Carta from Sir Winston Churchill, which shows the foundational concept of the limitation of legislative authority over Rights and the authority of any and all persons to enforce the constitution of the nation as constructed on fundamental law.

Whether one see Churchill as his enemy who agrees with our Rights being the SUPREME LAW, or an ally of Freedom, the fact of the inviolate nature of Rights in the face of legislative tyranny are still made clear.

The History of America has shown us that Checks and Balances have failed, whether the person is elected into Office or Appointed to the High Court, there is no difference. There is no shelter for any within and without government who point out the lawlessness.

Apparently, since the Constitution does not enforce itself, it appears that the only Amendment needed is for the Creation of a Council of Censors with a Police/Guard Force, Prison, and Prosecutor (hopefully a non-lawyer) to try the perpetrators of Crimes against THE PEOPLE, before a Jury under common-law.

In matter after matter, we have seen with amazement that the Congress cannot agree to do anything correct, but has no problem agreeing to give themselves raises and enrich their power and purses of friends.

We have seen that despite Constitution, Statute, U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, and Treaty, that we of THE PEOPLE with the most biting issues are ignored by the courts.

Meanwhile, the Executive Branch glories in its power and control to harass and oppress the people with the powers unlawfully seized by the Congress.

It is my hope that the Continental Congress will be the beginning and center point of a movement that finally shows THE PEOPLE a means of enforcement of the fundamental law which is THEIR RIGHTS.

(No, that is not a typographical error. Your Rights are the Fundamental Law that can never be changed by any vote of any body of human beings.)

It is my hope that one day soon the concerned People of America will concurrently implement the Recall Petitions herein to enforce their demand for a real choice and real election, not the same insanity of voting back and forth for either of the two criminal gangs who have brought this nation to ruin.