Two United States Blarney

Respectfully.

The U.S. Citizen argument is flat out Wrong.

U.S. Citizen was recognized in the California Constitution of 1848 and recognized in Congress in 1849, despite what the North Carolina Republic people teach and claim about the 14th Amendment.

Furthermore, the U.S. appears in the Articles of Confederation...or was that the Northwest Ordinance. That should make one who believes this nonsense blush for failing to consult their Fundamental and Foundational Documents.

Person in the 14th Amendment is not a new Citizen who is a Subject of government nor artificial person because the word "person" appears as the second word of the 5th Amendment.

That AGAIN should make one who believes this nonsense blush for failing to consult their Fundamental and Foundational Documents.

The only false constructs are Statute law of lawyers who have stolen the Office, Flag and Seal of THE PEOPLE to make fake and void law to oppress THE PEOPLE and enrich their Aristocracy, on where they are above THE PEOPLE and only accountable to each other.

That is plainly Unconstitutional in the Original Constitution of Michigan 1835, which the U.S. Congress signed on to and Approved as well as THE PEOPLE, and thus must be a point of our Fundamental Law.

There is no principle of law or fact to support a second government called "U.S." on American Soil that does not yield nor is subject to the Bill of Rights.

Summer before last a 14 year-old girl who was strip searched n the School of a County, of a State, in its administrative jurisdiction got her case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court who ruled that she did in fact have 4th Amendment protections even in that place where all sorts of other rules exist and there is a corporation charter somewhere.

Last year in Heller v. D.C. it was made clear that the Incorporated Municipality of D.C. is a place where the 2nd Amendment is applicable and governs. The Battle of Rogue governments against the Rights of THE PEOPLE rages on.

In the Virginia Constitution of 1776, which precedes the Constitution for the United States of America (1787), it plainly states that there shall be no government within Virginia that is not subject completely to the Constitution, which included their Bill of Rights.

In the Same Constitution the Virginians also stated plainly and nakedly in Article I of their Bill of Rights, that MAN can enter into no societal contract that infringes upon UNALIENABLE Rights.


“The Constitution of Virginia
June 29, 1776

Bill of Rights; June 12, 1776

A declaration of rights made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention; which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

SECTION 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity, namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.” (emphasis added)


Yes that is Right not even a societal contract can be formed against Rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court in West Virgina Board of Education v. Barnette explains that the Rights protected by the Bill of Rights (by the way the 9th Amendment makes it all encompassing) can never be subject to an vote of any legislature nor majority nor power of office.


"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. " (emphasis added)


West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette,
319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)(Opinion, J. Jackson)

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court has admitted and made clear that creatures of Constitution are completely subject to the Constitution from which they come. Therefore, no Legislature can create a corporation by their authority to violate the Constitution.

“…a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution." Reid v. Covert, 354 US l (1957)


Finally, fraud vitiates the contract. The Declaration of Independence and no less than 3 original constitutions of 3 states (check New Jersey, Maryland ?, North Carolina ?, New Hampshire) explain that when the government ceases to protect the Rights of THE PEOPLE, it ceases to be the Government and THE PEOPLE owe it no allegiance.

So:

----there is no Corporate Charter for a U.S. that can Violate the Bill of Rights and THE PEOPLE.

----there is no corporation that can exist in America that usurps the THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no government corporation that is not subject to the THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no government nor subdivision therefore that can exist that is not subject to THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

----there is no legal construct called U.S. that is not the same as the United States of America that is not subject to THE RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE.

It is Lawless People doing lawless things: http://www.uscourts.gov/outreach/resources/williampenntrial.htm

Lawless People continuing to do law less things:

“These are not extravagant expressions [Most Extrodinary Writ of Habeas Corpus ad subjincendum]. Behind them may be discerned the unceasing contest between personal [Page 372 U. S. 401] liberty and government oppression. It is no accident that habeas corpus has, time and again, played a central role in national crises wherein the claims of order and of liberty clash most acutely not only in England in the seventeenth century, [Footnote 8] but also in America from our very beginnings, and today. [Footnote 9] Although in form the Great Writ is simply a mode of procedure, its history is inextricably intertwined with the growth of fundamental rights of personal liberty. For its function has been to provide a prompt and efficacious remedy…” [remedy Lawyers and judges have usurped and tied down at every turn of use]



Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 399-401 (1963)

It is the Lawless Aristocracy of lawyers that infests every Branch of Government, every Office, every Court and both Parties to thrust their version of Statist Power down your throat.

It is servile and petulent America who is manipulated to serve those interests, who masochistically support the abuse of themselves and their progeny, who dare not understand Freedom. Liberty, Rights and the 9th Amendment, and who refuse their duty under Article 61 of the Magna Carta, which I do not offer my own self serving interpretation, but that of Sir Winston Churchill:

"Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect [1297] and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favor of any such successful attempts at abrogation [1215]. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it."


--Quote by Sir Winston Churchill, 1956,

It is they. the sloth and petulent, who are the problem and will carry it forward into the Tea Parties as I have found.

There is no complex legal structure that defeats the Fundamental law of America that springs forth from the Rights of Englishmen at the English Bill of RIghts and Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 and 1689 respectively, and the Magna Carta 1215. only mind sets of the sloths who want things given to them.

But just as with the 5 other reissues of the Magna Carta by the Crown, the Lawyers are always busy moving the boundry stone of WHO and WHAT We ARE, and how they must serve THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE.

I have personally discovered that even this present mass awakening of the People in the Tea Parties is false (as their leadership has railed at me and ejected me for showing what I have shown you), for they are Statist who want to be taken care of and to be given all that they demand,

The true Reformation is in the Continental Congress who has offered an actual course of action.

GOD'S speed and eternal Blessings to you,

Thurston Paul Bell