Action must be what THE PEOPLE will and are willing to do.

Action Report


Not having internet, I have been able to hear a little bit of audio through telephone from a friend.

With particularity the most interesting words came from comments or questions of Delegates after the presentation of a man who respects me enough to pick up the phone when I call; Mr. Jeff Dickstein.

One Delegate commented about a State nullifying the Amendment of the Constitution in question, to which Mr. Dickstein commented that such was tried in a state, but there was not enough support of THE PEOPLE to get the idea rolling forward and success would require many other states with motivation of THE PEOPLE to get the same thing going.

Thus, the missing ingredients for this Congress to be successful on that issue is:

a.) popular support; and;

b.) many states active at the same time.

Being that the issue is the income tax, and not everyone pays that or is interested, which is why the U.S. Department of Justice has trampled the First Amendment activities of the tax activist community, decimating it, without so much as a whimper of outcry of THE PEOPLE en masse; hope for any such awakening on a single issue is not likely to reach any critical mass.

Even Sun Tzu’s the Art of War explains that the Master General needs the cause that will make THE PEOPLE willing to give their Sons and Silver.

A Second Delegate, motivated by the exposure of the lawlessness of the Courts and the Executive Branch declared the circumstance was sufficient for the Continental Congress adopting a Declaration of Non-Compliance.

Mr. Dickstein had no comment to this, but the Delegate did go on to the point that such a Declaration meant that the signers would not comply with anything from the Federal Government whatsoever at whatever peril may befall the signer.

Such sounds like the self-sacrifice and slow martyrdom I am living everyday.

I cannot recommend this. I do not believe that any popular movement and uprising can be constructed upon this AT THIS PRESENT TIME.

While the idea is 1) well grounded in the Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence, 2) is not a singular issue activity, and 3) it might be successful for people on a State by state basis, not requiring actions by another state to be successful, THE PEOPLE as of yet are not in a position to adopt a confrontational posture such as facing arrest, trial, and time in a federal prison. That is clear and has been for the past 30 years of the Liberty Movement.

The same is true for the Delegate who brought up declaring War against the Government, by quoting the Declaration of Independence.

Even the Founders in 1774-1775 struggled with the notion of Independence and War.

It was Concord Bridge where the surprise wind of change occurred, and they saw what THE PEOPLE were willing to do. Only then did a draft of a Declaration make it to a Vote.


Different Circumstances – Same Game

At this time, place and circumstance of America, things are different from a Parliament and a King in 1776.

In Washington, those are OUR OFFICES, OUR SEALS, OUR FLAGS which the abrogators/usurpers/traitors/mutineers/pirates have stolen!

They have taken Oaths and have commandeered the vessel and its mission. Should we declare War on the Vessel?


The Biggest Lie of All

They have the moral high ground of Capitol Hill.

They have the Bridge Deck for all to see and tell THE PEOPLE their actions are legitimate because they were voted in democratically, that the RIGHTS of THE PEOPLE were contracted to these elected representatives to dispose of at their will when THE PEOPLE voted them into office.

"We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." Simons v. United States, 390 US 377, 394 (1968)

Since the U.S. Supreme Court has stated that such is the case with one Right, how much more true is their intolerance when all Rights except voting rights are waived by voting?

THE PEOPLE have been stupefied (made Stupid) by being taught lies from the beginning.


Education is Truth

THE PEOPLE must be educated out of the lie, that they contracted their RIGHTS to be disposed of by vote to elected officials.

THE PEOPLE have been educated by (‘government stupefication’- if I may say) into the lie that the Congress has plenary (complete) control over everything and is not a legislature of limitations as a Republic is, and guaranteed by Constitution to be.

So, to lead this Nation to reclaim the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE Education will have to precede Action…unless…

the Continental Congress adopts a method of action that is also Education at the same time.

even then success of the Action will require specific elements:

Popular Support – it must have the support of a very large body of the population, either on a singular issue or multiple issues.

Low Time Treasure, and Talent costs – it must be easy, not consume a large amount of time, money, and require a special ability of each individual.

Low Intensity/Risk – participation in the action carries a low or reasonably survivable Risk to the individual, if unsuccessful.

Reasonable – the action itself is well grounded in thought and reason to fuel its own growth into a mass uprising (education).


Petitions for Recall Fit the Requirements

The mutiny of U.S. Congress, Courts, and the Executive against the Supreme Law of OUR Rights, Liberty, Tranquility, and Prosperity is clear and present.

1 to 3.6 Million People on 9/12/09 were able to take the time and treasure to fill Washington D.C. and make clear that THE PEOPLE will unite against the Government on multiple issues for the resolution of Self-Governance and Liberty, to get the government out of their lives.

That body of the populace has stated that they are willing to take Action of Vote, which is similar to the Petition, in order to make their voices heard.

The Petition signing act is very low cost in Time and Treasure for the individual signer, and the length of the Petition is the minimum amount of time and talent required to fully participate.

The Petition signing act is low intensity and Risk. There is no violation of any unconstitutional law by signing the Petition. It carries no action that should make any fear prosecution for being a part.


Leadership

The body of the discontented PEOPLE is leaderless precisely because the discontent of THE PEOPLE is pursuant to so many different issues, and Organizations are single issue entities.

This is the Time, this is the Place, to unite THE PEOPLE on the singular issue of government interference and Control of their Lives and Liberty. Never before, have so many, been so enraged, by so much committed against them, by so few.

To lead them to victory, one must be able to hold them together against a defined common foe; Centralized Government Authority over their lives.

The diversity of the Continental Congress is the microcosm of the groups and States, where varied issues and body politics all converge and meet.

To be successful, the Continental Congress needs THE PEOPLE, popular support, an en masse movement, which is already afoot and ready for the low intensity action of the Petitions.

I might be wrong in all of this, but…It is my belief that THE PEOPLE cannot have their lives of tranquility and prosperity, as promised, as long as the Pirates and Traitors have possession of the stolen property of OUR Offices, Seals, and Flags, or have not at least made a great and valiant attempt to TAKE THEM BACK, even it only to be further insulted by government ever swelling their ranks.

Resistance will get the Governor Recalled and the numbers of THE PEOPLE should force State Legislative Officials on to the Side of THE PEOPLE. Such may well begin the retaking of the States that Judge Andrew Napolitano has spoken of.

There is much that the Petitions function for, and rejection is not a dead end.

Ponder carefully your course of Action Delegates.

Restrain your emotions.

There is an Army out here who will be lead by Leaders who recommend reasonable action, even action that is slowly graduated in risk and intensity, as the Rogue Government ratchets up its insults to the Rights of THE PEOPLE.


GOD’s Speed Delegates

The Cause of the Petitions and Continental Congress

Before I begin my article I wanted to make things easy for the people who are trying to catch up on the Blog, as the prior Articles on the Blog are not time sensitive, and carry a lot of explanation of things that will help the interested Reader.

So here is the hyperlinked list:

RECALL U.S. SENATORS NOW

This was expected

Judicial and Legislative Tyranny

E. Pluribus Unum - The Spirit of 9-12-2009

You say you want a Revolution?… (Just who are the Revolutionaries)

They will say you want a Civil War…

Petition Structure and Substance

The Ultimate Despised Petition

Judge Proves In Perpetuum

__________________________________________________

THE ARTICLE STARTS HERE

The cause of the Petitions and the Continental Congress are one in the same.

The fact is that despite the authors of the Constitution and the Founders best efforts at making a system of Checks and Balances, something has seeped into the function of government that has made checks and balances to be a cruel hoax. A sick joke.

One of the Founders in particular (perhaps Benjamin Franklin), or someone in the Pennsylvania Constitutional Convention (1776) either understood the problem with checks and balances being left only in the laps of those being paid to exercise power, and therefore gave everyone in the Convention an education to the point that they adopted a clause that created a "Council of Censors".

“SECT. 47. In order that the freedom of the commonwealth may be preserved inviolate forever, there shall be chosen by ballot by the freemen … called the COUNCIL OF CENSORS… whose duty it shall be to enquire whether the constitution has been preserved inviolate in every part; and whether the legislative and executive branches of government have performed their duty as guardians of the people, or assumed to themselves, or exercised other or greater powers than they are intitled (sic) to by the constitution: They are also to enquire whether the public taxes have been justly laid and collected in all parts of this commonwealth, in what manner the public monies have been disposed of, and whether the laws have been duly executed… they shall have power to send for persons, papers, and records; they shall-have authority to pass public censures, to order impeachments, and to recommend to the legislature the repealing such laws as appear to them to have been enacted contrary to the principles of the constitution.”

The job was simple, The only function of this body was just like a Police Citizens Review Committee. To identify and root out perpetrators of wrong acts.

In previous articles I did show some comments about the Magna Carta from Sir Winston Churchill, which shows the foundational concept of the limitation of legislative authority over Rights and the authority of any and all persons to enforce the constitution of the nation as constructed on fundamental law.

Whether one see Churchill as his enemy who agrees with our Rights being the SUPREME LAW, or an ally of Freedom, the fact of the inviolate nature of Rights in the face of legislative tyranny are still made clear.

The History of America has shown us that Checks and Balances have failed, whether the person is elected into Office or Appointed to the High Court, there is no difference. There is no shelter for any within and without government who point out the lawlessness.

Apparently, since the Constitution does not enforce itself, it appears that the only Amendment needed is for the Creation of a Council of Censors with a Police/Guard Force, Prison, and Prosecutor (hopefully a non-lawyer) to try the perpetrators of Crimes against THE PEOPLE, before a Jury under common-law.

In matter after matter, we have seen with amazement that the Congress cannot agree to do anything correct, but has no problem agreeing to give themselves raises and enrich their power and purses of friends.

We have seen that despite Constitution, Statute, U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, and Treaty, that we of THE PEOPLE with the most biting issues are ignored by the courts.

Meanwhile, the Executive Branch glories in its power and control to harass and oppress the people with the powers unlawfully seized by the Congress.

It is my hope that the Continental Congress will be the beginning and center point of a movement that finally shows THE PEOPLE a means of enforcement of the fundamental law which is THEIR RIGHTS.

(No, that is not a typographical error. Your Rights are the Fundamental Law that can never be changed by any vote of any body of human beings.)

It is my hope that one day soon the concerned People of America will concurrently implement the Recall Petitions herein to enforce their demand for a real choice and real election, not the same insanity of voting back and forth for either of the two criminal gangs who have brought this nation to ruin.

Judge Proves In Perpetuum

The point of the Petitions drawing the lines for the impending Battle:

Statutory Law v. Natural Law/Fundamental Law/Unalienable In Perpetuum Rights

The Regulation of Liberty and Freedom is the destruction of Liberty and Freedom.

Stand up and be counted. 

Support the adoption of the Petitions by the Continental Congress.

The Government is the insidious enemey as he points out.

The Ultimate Despised Petition

Previously, I left off a prior article with this:

"Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect [1297] and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favor of any such successful attempts at abrogation [1215]. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it."

--Quote by Sir Winston Churchill, 1956

This comment about section 61 of the Magna Carta leaves the reader with an uncomfortable vision of public unrest and convulsion.

This was in the original Magna Carta, and removed in the subsequent re-issues by the Crown.

Since America exists today by the Declaration of Independence, it is clear that the Founders of America had resurrected Article 61, having had enough of the game being played by “British Rules.” (constantly changing as you go along)

The state of New Hampshire seems to have understood that this provision of law is alive and well:

"10. Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind."

Also Maryland:

"IV. That all persons invested with the legislative or executive powers of government are the trustees of the public, and, as such, accountable for their conduct; wherefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought, to reform the old or establish a new government. The doctrine of non-resistance, against arbitrary power and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind."

Pennsylvania said:

"VI. That those who are employed in the legislative and executive business of the State, may be restrained from oppression, the people have a right, at such periods as they may think proper, to reduce their public officers to a private station,"

Tennessee as well:

"II. That government being instituted for the common benefit, the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression, is absurd, slavish and destructive to the good and happiness of mankind."

Georgia:

2. God has ordained that men shall live under government; but as the forms and administration of civil government are in human, and therefore, fallible hands, they may be altered, or modified whenever the safety or happiness of the governed requires it. No government should be changed for light or transient causes; nor unless upon reasonable assurance that a better will be established.

New Jersey:

"2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it."

Virginia:

"SEC. 3. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, when any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal."

The reasoning supporting this idea of government FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, against the notion of eternal struggle against the Right of Kings was also addressed in the Founding of the States:

New Jersey:

“…allegiance and protection are, in the nature of things, reciprocal ties, each equally depending upon the other, and liable to be dissolved by the others being refused or withdrawn.”

Georgia:

“3. Protection to person and property is the duty of Government; and a Government which knowingly and persistently denies, or withholds from the governed such protection, when within its power, releases from the obligation of obedience.”

North Carolina:

“Whereas, allegiance and protection are in their nature reciprocal, and the one should of right be refused when the other is withdrawn;"

New Hampshire:

“3. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to ensure the protection of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void.”

Here is a little comment from Virginia that reveals not only the breadth of UNALIENABLE, but also the limitations of societal contracts on UNALIENABLE Rights:

"SECTION 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity, namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety."

Thus, just as West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette explained (where the Nazi-like salute to the Flag was struck by the high Court), Civil War or no Civil War, the form of the government being about UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, never has gone away.

It is then significant that Magna Carta as represented above by Sir Winston Churchill well reveals the first of despised petitions is non compliance:

“...at abrogation shall have no force nor effect [1297] and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect”

such a course of action is a nice idea if the Jury was not usurped as the Courts have cultivated and allowed. (That is addressed in the Causes of the Petitions.)

This leaves the act of War against the Legislators, Courts, and Executives as the final course of action against the usurpers of OUR GOVERNMENT; WE THE PEOPLE and OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS.

Who is ready to risk all against the usurpers in their kangaroo Courts? None.

Who is ready to be violent? Hopefully none.

For over 30 years the Patriots who have chosen those courses are buried or waste in prison as this Author may soon be doing, and THE PEOPLE do nothing still.

But we are still not at that final place yet.

Such is why I have created the Petitions for Recall.

The author senses that because so many have awakened these Petitions for Recall have a chance of changing the circumstances. That they are the final option as a political reality, as well as an educational toolof reforming our minds. Not just educational when the usurping government slaps THE PEOPLE yet again in the face, but educational in providing conviction in the hearts of those who hurt enough in these circumstances that they are drawn to demand action and can identify real action that will reform the government.

The Continental Congress will meet in just over a week 2009 to try and devise a course of action. Well folks, successful action is going to require inclusion and motivation of the largest numbers of people, now that so many are awakened to the immediacy of Reform.

The causes of the Patriots in the past seemed too light for the forcing of change by the majority enjoying their materialism. With the States now on the verge of collapse, the weight of current events have drawn more of the PEOPLE out into the streets clamoring for actual change of direction, not just the change of the individuals who are beating the life out of THE PEOPLE. (This past election, THE PEOPLE vote to have the guy on the left beat on them for a while, and in 7 short months they tired of that.)

Perhaps these Petitions will provide America with the foundational education that is needed to avoid the Magna Carta Article 61 option.

If the groups clamoring for reform do not pick up on the idea of these Petitions, we will just see THE PEOPLE ask the guy on the Right to take over for a while yet again. (No difference in that, just look at his deficit spending.)

Conditions as deteriorated as they are, and government persists, I will then expect convulsive violence, as so many do not trust the government or either of the two gangs any more, and they as individuals will be out of money to have time to buy the next false promise.

If the dollar collapse presses the no confidence vote in a collapsed government, THE PEOPLE will have no choice but to ignore all of the laws and government intrusion that is between them and survival. Without an education of fundamental Law of UNALIENABLE, what America will be will not be Anarchy, but will be lawless chaos.

The only difference between these two futures is a national cohesive group taking action in proper lawful light.